Pedagogical aspects of improving communication skills of university students

Myroslava Fabian; Serhii Rabiichuk; Nataliia Mykhalchenko; Nataliia Pavlushchenko; Alina Dzhurylo; Tetiana Soroka

doi:10.37497/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n00.pe01594

Authors

Myroslava Fabian Uzhhorod National University, Uzhhorod https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-1275
Serhii Rabiichuk Khmelnytskyi National University, Khmelnytskyi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3948-0083
Nataliia Mykhalchenko Sukhomlynskyi National University of Mykolaiv , Mykolaiv https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0327-5491
Nataliia Pavlushchenko Sumy State Pedagogical University
Alina Dzhurylo Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5129-6724
Tetiana Soroka Izmail State University Of Humanities, Izmail https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7680-6604

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37497/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n00.pe01594

Keywords:

Educational System, Educational Institutions, Technology, Educational Process

Abstract

Objective: pedagogical conditions that contribute to the development of communicative self-sufficiency of students of higher educational institutions.

Method: The theoretical and methodological basis of the study consists of the following components: the basics of the general theory of management and management, the analysis of management in the field of education, as well as the main principles of marketing as a methodology for the activity of any enterprise in the conditions of a market economy, the theory and practice of marketing, marketing concepts in the field of education , as well as work in the field of marketing of additional education and management of educational systems. Areas of pedagogical innovation are also taken into account.

Results: The article clarifies the essence and content of the concept of "communicative self-efficacy of university students". The pedagogical content of the process of formation of communicative self-efficacy of university students has been clarified. The evaluation diagnostic toolkit was theoretically substantiated, developed and tested, taking into account the criteria, indicators and levels of formation of the communicative self-efficacy of university students.

Contribution: Pedagogical conditions for the formation of communicative self-efficacy of university students were developed and implemented, and their effectiveness was experimentally verified. It is substantiated that the communicative self-efficacy of university students is a personal meta-quality that reflects the conscious mastery of productive strategies and tactics of communication, confidence in one's own possibilities of their implementation and achievement of constructive results, which ensures effective and flexible communicative behavior in various spheres of activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Iasechko, S., & Iasechko, M. (2024). The role and impact of artificial intelligence in modern education: analysis of problems and prospects. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(00), e26. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v5i00.26

Jiang, X-R., Du, J-J., & Dong, R-Y. (2017). Coping style, job burnout and mental health of university teachers of the millennial generation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3379–3392. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00734a

Keller, J., & Kesberg, R. (2017). Regulatory focus and human values. Psihologija, 50(2), 157–186. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI160809004K

Knyazeva, N., Mikhailova , I., Usmanova, N., & Shindina, T. (2022). Overcoming barriers in developing digital skills for higher education teachers: challenges and solutions. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3, e24. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v3i00.24

Lampou, R. (2023). The integration of artificial intelligence in education: opportunities and challenges. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4, e15. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v4i00.15

Lima, A. A., & Ribeiro, T. de L. S. (2023). Evolution of Sustainable Development Goals Research in Social Sciences: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. SDGs Studies Review , 4(goals), e01562. https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v4igoals.4

Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W.B., & Leiter, M.P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397

Menghi, M.S., Rodriguez, L.M., & Oñate, M.E. (2019). Differences in burnout dimension values in educators with and without symptoms or health problems. Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(3), 179–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n3.338

Mojsa-Kaja, J., Golonka, K., & Marek, T. (2015). Job burnout and engagement among teachers – Worklife areas and personality traits as predictors of relationships with work. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 28(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00238

Mosleh, S.M., Kasasbeha, M.A., Aljawarneh, Y.M., Alrimawi, I., & Saifan, A.R. (2022, June 20). The impact of online teaching on stress and burnout of academics during the transition to remote teaching from home. BMC Med Educ, 22, Article 475. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022- 03496-3

Reynolds, M. (2020). State of the Internet amid coronavirus pandemic. S&P Global Ratings. Retrieved from https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/state-of-the-internet-amid-coronavirus-pandemic-8211-s-p-podcast-59001571

Mauranen, A. (2012). Exploring ELF: Academic English shaped by non-native speakers. Cambridge University Press.

Meisel, J.M. (2008). The multilingual mind: A modular processing perspective. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Mercer, S. (2016). Towards an understanding of language learner self-concept. Springer.

Bax, S. (2011). Normalization revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1-15.

Suárez Pérez, M. M. (2019). Communicative language teaching and its impact on EFL learners' oral proficiency development. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 516-534.